Democracy under siege
Keywords:
democracy, oligarchy, globalization, financial capitalism, crisis, populismAbstract
Modern democracy attempted to solve the dilemmas posed by opposing features from various traditions through two strategies: representation, which allowed it to incorporate citizens’ conflicting interests within a restricted collegiate group that permitted deliberation and agreement, on one side, and universal choice of representa tives and governments for limited periods of time, on the other. Since the first decades of the 20th century, this notion of democracy within the framework of a republican constitution was opposed by another one that rejected all forms of parliamentarianism, discussion and public deliberation in the name of a “democracy” based on the identity and homogeneity of a mass of people under the hegemonic leadership of a party, centered around the will and decisions of a managing elite and a charismatic leader, viewed as the sole representative of the people themselves. Both forms of democracy –strict and perverted – are being harassed by the powers unleashed by globalization and transnationalisation that are becoming alien oligarchies, opposed to the notion of citizenship and restrictive of its rights. In liberal parliamentary democracies the functional imperative issued by the financial sector is channeled through a crisis cabinet that assimilates demands and transforms them by managing an everchanging budget whose aim is to add new sufferings to the bulk of the population that can only counteract through protest. Given the constitutional backdrop of these societies, with their deep democratic network, the gradual transformation of the European Union into a transnational arena fuelled by “a club of chiefs of state” has only made yet more patent the oligarchic turn of its post-crisis evolution. In plebiscite democracies the turn was operated through a sovereign entrenchment of the power of the oligarchy on the pretext of resistance to the pressure set by globalization. Since the onset of the 90s, Latin America as well as countries in Eastern Europe have witnessed a gradual turn toward what O’Donnell has termed “delegative democracies”, or neo-populism, according to other authors. These regimes are characterized by exalting a populist leader, upholding him as a savior who will gauge the needs and wishes of the mass of individuals without intermediaries, focusing mainly on those who feel excluded from the mainstream of institutionalized democracy. This ensures feedback to populist regimes supported by a hegemonic political party that lives on State resources and on the rampant corruption it protects in order to finance ‘clientelism’ among those excluded from the system by the policies of the State itself.
Downloads
References
Archibugi, D. (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Aristóteles. Política, ed. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.
Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across Borders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bohman, J.; Richardson, H. (2009). “Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and ‘Reasons that All Can Accept’”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17: 253–274.
Botana, N. (2010), ed. Argentina 2010: entre la frustración y la esperanza. Buenos Aires: Taurus.
Buchanan, A.; Powell, R. (2008). “Constitutional Democracy and the Rule of International Law: Are They Compatible?”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16: 326–349.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.; Smith, A. (2011). The Dictator’s Handbook. New York: Public Affairs.
Caney, S. (2007). “Global Poverty and Human Rights: The Case for Positive Duties”. En Pogge (2007): 275–302.
Canovan, M. (1999). “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy”. Political Studies, 47: 2–16.
Center for the Study of Human Rights (1994). Twenty-Five Human Rights Documents. New York: Columbia University.
Charney, J. (1993). “Universal International Law”. American Journal of International Law, 87: 529–551.
Cohen, J. (2010). The Arc of the Moral Universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
De la Torre, C. (2009). “Populismo radical y democracia en los Andes”. Journal of Democracy en Español, 1: 24–37.
De la Torre, C. (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. 2ª ed. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Di Tella, T. (1997). “Populism into the Twenty-first Century”. Government and Opposition, 32: 187–200.
Gargarella, R. (2011), ed. La constitución en 2020. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Gerchunoff, P. (2010). “Causas y azares… en más de un siglo de historia económica argentina”. En Russell (2010): 103–166.
Gilabert, P. (2012). “Is There a Human Right to Democracy? A Response to Joshua Cohen”. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política.
Glendon, M. A. (2002). A World Made New. New York: Random House.
Guariglia, O. (2007). “Enforcing Economic and Social Human Rights”. En Pogge (2007): 345–357.
Guariglia, O. (2010a). En camino de una justicia global. Barcelona–Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Guariglia, O. (2010b). “La República y la ética: una relación conflictiva”. En Botana (2010): 183–215.
Guariglia, O. (2011). “La democracia en América Latina: la alternativa entre populismo y democracia deliberativa”. Isegoría, 44: 57–72.
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1997). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2011). Zur Verfassung Europas. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hobsbawm, E. (2007). Globalisation, Democracy and Terrorism. London: Little, Brown.
Kelsen, H. (1981 [1929]). Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Aalen: Scientia Verlag.
Kelsen, H. (1958). “Die Einheit von Völkerrecht und staatlichem Recht”. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 19: 234–248.
Kelsen, H. (1982). Teoría pura del derecho. México: UNAM.
Keohane, R.; Macedo, S.; Moravcsik, A. (2009). “Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism”. International Organization, 63: 1–31.
Lauren, P. G. (2003). The Evolution of International Human Rights. 2ª ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Meckled-García, S. (2008). “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16: 245–271.
Meron, T. (1986). “On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights”. American Journal of International Law, 80: 1–23.
Michelman, F. (1986). “Foreword: Traces of Self-Government”. Harvard Law Review, 100: 4–77.
Mouffe, C. (2000). “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism”. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Nagel, T. (2005). “The Problem of Global Justice”. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33: 113–147.
Nino, C. S. (1997). La constitución de la democracia deliberativa. Barcelona: Gedisa.
O’Donnell, G. (1994). “Delegative Democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 5: 55–69.
O’Donnell, G. (2010). “El riesgo de un deslizamiento de la democracia al autoritarismo”. Clarín, 12-01-2010.
Patten, A. (1996). “The Republican Critique of Liberalism”. British Journal of Political Science, 26: 25–44.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pettit, P. (2002). “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple”. Political Theory, 30: 339–356.
Pogge, T. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pogge, T. (2005). “Real World Justice”. Journal of Ethics, 9(1–2): 29–53.
Pogge, T. (2007), ed. Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rich, R. (2001). “Bringing Democracy into International Law”. Journal of Democracy, 12: 20–34.
Roberts, K. (1995). “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America”. World Politics, 48: 82–116.
Roberts, K. (2006). “Populism, Political Conflict, and Grass-Roots Organization in Latin America”. Comparative Politics, 38: 127–148.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox. New York: W. W. Norton.
Romero, L. A. (2010). “Democracia, república y estado…”. En Russell (2010): 15–102.
Russell, R. (2010), ed. Argentina 1910–2010: Balance del siglo. Buenos Aires: Taurus.
Schmitt, C. (1926). Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Schmitt, C. (1938). Die Wendung zum diskriminierenden Kriegsbegriff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Schmitt, C. (1922). Politische Theologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Sengupta, A. (2007). “Poverty Eradication and Human Rights”. En Pogge (2007): 323–344.
Shelton, D. (2006). “Normative Hierarchy in International Law”. American Journal of International Law, 100: 291–323.
Shue, H. (1988). “Mediating Duties”. Ethics, 98: 687–704.
Shue, H. (1996). Basic Rights. 2ª ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Singer, P. (2004). One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making Globalization Work. New York: W. W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. (2010). Freefall. New York: W. W. Norton.
United Nations Committee on Human Rights (1996). General Comment No. 25.
United Nations Commission on Human Rights (1999). Resolution 1999/57.
Verdross, A. (1937). “Forbidden Treaties in International Law”. American Journal of International Law, 31: 571–577.
Verdross, A. (1966). “Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law”. American Journal of International Law, 60: 55–63.
Weyland, K. (2001). “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”. Comparative Politics, 34: 1–22.
Williamson, J. (2004). “A Short History of the Washington Consensus”.
