Anomie and the political theory of oligarchy
Keywords:
Nino, anomie, oligarchy, democracy, crisisAbstract
In his book Un país al márgen de la ley, Carlos Nino offers an extremely critical reconstruction of Argentina’s institutional life and its juridical, constitutional and socioeconomic history. He describes a chaotic scenario where laws are distorted or ignored, rules are proclaimed but never followed, social duties, such as the duty to pay taxes, are dodged and transactions with the state are “sorted out” by the means of bribes. Nino refers to this state of affairs as stupid anomie because it creates a game where everyone wants to obtain benefits but ends-up in the worst imaginable situation. Taking this diagnosis as a starting point, this article aims to show that the average citizen of an anomic society depicted by Nino is the same as the individual living under an oligarchic political regime, understanding this as a regime where economic power is concentrated in a small group of people, or as a regime where political power is administered by a populistic leader an her close collaborators. In order to achieve this aim, I offer a quick analysis of global and domestic socioeconomic scenarios.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D.; Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why Nations Fail. Londres: Profile Books.
Aristóteles (1957). Política (ed. W. D. Ross). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Botana, N. (2010). Argentina 2010: entre la frustración y la esperanza. Buenos Aires: Taurus.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.; Smith, A. (2011). The Dictator’s Handbook. New York: Public Affairs.
Canovan, M. (1999). “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy”. Political Studies, 47: 2–16.
De la Torre, C. (2009). “Populismo radical y democracia en los Andes”. Journal of Democracy en Español, 1: 24–37.
De la Torre, C. (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Diderot, D. (1950). Le Neveu de Rameau. Genève: Droz.
Gel’man, V. (2004). “The Unrule of Law in the Making: The Politics of Informal Institution Building in Russia”. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(7): 1021–1040.
Gerchunoff, P. (2010). “Causas y azares… en más de un siglo de historia económica argentina”. En Russell (2010): 103–166.
Guariglia, O. (2007). “Enforcing economic and social human rights”. En Pogge (2007): 345–357.
Guariglia, O. (2010b). “La República y la ética: una relación conflictiva”. En Botana (2010): 183–215.
Guariglia, O. (2011). “La democracia en América Latina: la alternativa entre populismo y democracia deliberativa”. Isegoría, 44: 57–72.
Guriev, S.; Rachinsky, A. (2005). “The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1): 131–150.
Habermas, J. (2011). Zur Verfassung Europas. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2013). Im Sog der Technokratie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. Londres–Nueva York: Routledge.
Nino, C. (1997). La constitución de la democracia deliberativa. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Nino, C. (2011). Un país al margen de la ley. Buenos Aires: Ariel.
O’Donnell, G. (1994). “Delegative Democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 5: 55–69.
O’Donnell, G. (2010). Democracia, agencia y estado. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Pogge, T. (2007). Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
Redondo, N. (2002). “Pobreza y reproducción social a fines de la convertibilidad”.
Roberts, K. (1995). “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America”. World Politics, 48: 82–116.
Roberts, K. (2006). “Populism, Political Conflict, and Grass-Roots Organization in Latin America”. Comparative Politics, 38: 127–148.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox. New York: W. W. Norton.
Romero, L. A. (2010). “Democracia, república y estado: cien años de experiencia política en la Argentina”. En Russell (2010): 15–102.
Russell, R. (2010). Argentina 1910–2010: Balance del siglo. Buenos Aires: Taurus.
Salvia, A. (2013). “La evolución de la pobreza en la Argentina urbana”. Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina, UCA.
Schmitt, C. (1996 [1926]). Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Schmitt, C. (2009 [1963]). Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making Globalization Work. New York: W. W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. (2010). Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. (2012). The Price of Inequality. Londres: Penguin Books.
Streeck, W. (2013). Gekaufte Zeit: Die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
United Nations Commission on Human Rights (1999). Promotion of the Right to Democracy, Resolution 1999/57.
Weyland, K. (2001). “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”. Comparative Politics, 34: 1–22.
Winters, J. (2012). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
