The Max Weber's Elitism Tendency
A New Exploration of His Party and Bureaucratic Positions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36446/rlfp178Keywords:
bureaucratic system, Elitism, party system, power structure, Max WeberAbstract
This article argues that Max Weber's perspective on political parties and bureaucratic systems hints at an elitist inclination, which is revealed through a thorough examination of his descriptive writings. Furthermore, the article delves into two pivotal questions: firstly, whether elitism confers legitimacy upon the centralization of power among the elite, and secondly, whether the pessimism inherent in this discourse clashes with Weber's other theoretical positions. The profound exploration of these issues not only deepens our comprehension of the theme but also reinforces the article's thesis. Indeed, the discussion in this article offers a novel lens through which to reevaluate Weber's theories, contributing not only to the historical study of political philosophy but also to the philosophical inquiry into power structures. Furthermore, this enhanced understanding aids in reassessing and addressing the current global democratic crisis, which has been exacerbated by the resurgence of populism.
Downloads
References
Adamovich, Ludwig K. and Funk, Bernd C. 1987. Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. Wien and New York: Springer.
Alexander, Jeffrey -C. 2012. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Vol. 3, The Classical Attempt at Theoretical Synthesis: Max Weber. Oakland,?CA: University of California Press.
Ashcraft, Richard. 1972. “Marx and Weber on Liberalism as Bourgeois Ideology”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 14, no. 2: 130-168.
Ben, Stanley. 2008. “The Thin Ideology of Populism”, Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 13, no. 1, 95-110.
Bendix, Reinhardt. 1978. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Besnard, Pierre. 1930. Les Syndicats Ouvriers et la Révolution sociale. Paris: Editions Le Monde Nouveau.
Collins, Randall. 1968. “A Comparative Approch to Political Sociology”, State and Society: A reader in comparative political sociology. Edited by Reinhard Bendix, 42-67. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Brown Little.
François, Stéphane. 2018. “Le populisme, un terme trompeur”, Sudouest. https://newho.prod.sudouest.fr/redaction/le-cercle-sud-ouest-des-idees/le-populisme-un-terme-trompeur-2889046.php. Accessed in November 14, 2024.
Gast, Henrik M.A. 2009. “Was bedeutet „politische Führung“?”, Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, Vol. 2, 211-229.
Gu, Zhonghua. 2004. ???? [Weberianism]. Guilin: Guangxi normal university press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des Kommunilkativen Handelns. (Band 1). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Habibi, Mohammad Khalid. 2024. “Analysis of the Elitism Theory from the Perspective of Political Sociology”, Journal of Social Sciences - Kabul University, Vol. 7, no. 1, 127-142.
Hawkins, Kirk A. and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal -R. 2019. "Introduction: The Ideational Approach", The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis:Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy. Edited by Kirk A. Hawkins et al., 1-24. London and New York: Routledge.
Jansma, Judith. 2019. "Culture in the Name of the People?: Towards a typology of populism and culture", Debats: Journal on culture, power and society, Vol. 4, 119-132.
Kolko, Gabriel. 1959. “A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of History”, Ethics, Vol. 70, no.1: 21-36.
Loewensten, Karl. 1966. Max Weber's Political Idals in the Perspective of Our Time. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1968. Industrialization and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mitzman, Arthur. 1973. Sociology and Estrangement. New York: Hardcover.
Mommsen,Wolfgang -J. 1974. The Age of Bureaucracy: perspectives on the political sociology of Max Weber Responsibility. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal -R. 2013. "Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America", Government and Opposition, Vol. 48, no. 2: 147-174.
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, no. 4, 541-563.
Nipperdey, Thomas. 1993. Deutsche Geschichte: 1866-1918, Bd. 2: Machtstaat vor der Demokratie. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Peterson, Larry. 1981. “The One Big Union in International Perspective: Rebolutionary Industrial Unionism 1900-1925”, Labour/Le Travai, Vol. 7: 41-66.
Ringer, Fritz K. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1980-1918. Cambridge: Mass.
Ringer, Fritz K. 1997. Max Weber's Methodology: the Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. New York: Harvard University Press.
Schwinn, Thomas. 2014. “Von der okzidentalen zur multiplen Moderne”, Max Weber-Handbuch: Leben, Werk, Wirkung. Hrsg. Hans-Peter Müller und Steffen Sigmund, 415-420. Stuttgart: Springer.
Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1979. Gemeinschaft und Gesellachaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Vallentyne, Peter. 2017. “Distributive Justice”, A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Edited by Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit and Thomas Pogge, 548-562. New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Weber, Max. 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Weber, Max. 1988. “Politik als Beruf”, Max Weber: Gesammelte politische Schriften. Hrsg. von Johannes Winckelmann. 505-560. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
Weber, Max. 2007. “Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie”, Schlüsselwerke der Politikwissenschaft. Hrsg. Steffen Kailitz, 489-493. Tübingen: Springer.
Weber, Marianne. 2017. Max Weber: a biography. London: Routledge.
Wenck, Martin. 1905. Die Geschichte der Nationalsozialen: Von 1895 Bis 1903. Berlin: Hilfe-Verlag.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
