'Representation' in Open Democracy

Una advertencia en contra del relativismo en teoría política

Authors

  • Matías Parmigiani National University of Córdoba, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36446/rlfp143

Keywords:

Political representation, Artistic representation, Inclusivity, Ronald Dworkin, Williams

Abstract

The present paper discusses H. Landemore’s positivistic approach to political representation, which she takes to be, as Rehfeld would put it, a value-free concept. By taking sides with H. Pitkin’s standard account, here it will be argued that political theory has much to gain from adopting a normative and value-laden concept just right from the start, for it is the best way to acknowledge its practical implications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Austin, J. 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge (Inglaterra): Cambridge University Press.

Black, M. 1996. “¿Cómo representan las imágenes?”. En E. Gombrich, J. Hochberg y M. Black (autores), Arte, percepción y realidad, 127-169. Barcelona: Paidós.

Dahl, R. A. 1961. “The Concept of Power”. En Introductory Readings in Political Behavior, editado por S. Sidney Ulmer, 342-63. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Dworkin, R. 2004. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Dworkin, R. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Goertz, G. y Mahoney, J. 2012. “Concepts and Measurement: Ontology and Epistemology”. Social Science Information 51, Nº 2: 205-216. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018412437108

Hart, H. L. A. 2009. El concepto de Derecho. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.

Hempel, C. 1952. Fundamentos de la formación de conceptos en ciencia empírica. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Krausz, M. 2011. “Varieties of Relativism and the Reach of Reasons”. En A Companion to Relativism, editado por Steven D. Hales, 70-84. Oxford (Inglaterra): Wiley-Blackwell.

Landemore, H. 2020. Open Democracy. Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Najmanovich, D. 2016. La construcción de la experiencia 1. El mito de la objetividad. Buenos Aires: Biblos.

Parmigiani, M. 2022. Emergencia, Derecho y objetividad. Apuntes filosóficos para un futuro (menos) incierto. Lima (Perú): Yachay.

Pitkin, H. F. 1984. Wittgenstein: El lenguaje, la política y la justicia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.

Putnam, H. 1990. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Rehfeld, A. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation”. The Journal of Politics 68, No. 1 (Feb.): 1-21. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449602

Sartori, G. 1975. “The Tower of Babel”. En Tower of Babel: On the Definition and Analysis of Concepts in the Social Sciences, editado por Giovanni Sartori, Fred W. Riggs y Henry Teune, 7-38. Pittsburgh, PA: International Studies Association Occasional Paper 6.

Schaffer, F. C. 2016. Elucidating Social Science Concepts. An Interpretativist Guide. New York y Londres: Routledge.

Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Londres y New York: Routledge.

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Parmigiani, M. (2024). ’Representation’ in Open Democracy: Una advertencia en contra del relativismo en teoría política. Revista Latinoamericana De Filosofía Política, 13(1), 12–39. https://doi.org/10.36446/rlfp143

Issue

Section

Symposium: On Helen Landemore´´´´´ s "Open Democracy"