Experience and meaning: feminist contribution to the debate
Keywords:
experience, feminisms, subjectivity, feminist theory, meaningAbstract
The aim of the following work is to make a contribution to the field of experience from a tour of some of the contributions made from feminisms to this concept. Consequently, the article is arranged along two axes. In the first, the contributions of three feminist authors relevant to the debate about the notion of experience are reviewed. The proposed interpretation is based on pointing out the place given by these authors to the significant dimension in their definitions. In particular, two lines of analysis are identified: on the one hand, those who consider experience to be a significant event and, on the other hand, those who affirm the excess of experience with regard to meaning and the importance of addressing other levels of analysis. In the second axis, starting from a critical reading of these ways of conceiving experience, we will develop a possible way of approaching this concept in empirical research.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2014. La política cultural de las emociones. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Alcoff Martin, Linda. 1999. “Merleau-Ponty y la teoría feminista sobre la experiencia”. Revista Mora 5: 122–138.
Alcoff Martin, Linda. 2002. “Feminismo cultural vs. postestructuralismo: la crisis de identidad de la teoría feminista”. Revista Debats 76: 1–26.
Alcoff Martin, Linda. 2018. Rape and Resistance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Bach, Ana María. 2010. Las voces de la experiencia. El viraje de la filosofía feminista. Buenos Aires: Biblos Editorial.
de Lauretis, Teresa. 1992. Alicia ya no: feminismo, semiótica, cine. Valencia: Universitat de València.
de Lauretis, Teresa. 1996. “La tecnología del género”. Revista Mora 2: 6–34.
Delaney, Samuel R. 2014. The motion of light in water: Sex and science fiction writing in the East Village. New York: Open Road Media.
Esquivel, Juliana. 2019. “Construyendo experiencias: sentidos y emociones en una organización de mujeres (2017–2018)”. Tesis de doctorado. Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Figueroa, Alan. 2019. Fugitiva. La Plata: Pixel.
López, Damián. 2012. “La prueba de la experiencia. Reflexiones en torno al uso del concepto de experiencia en la historiografía reciente”. Prismas, Revista de Historia Intelectual 1: 33–53.
McAdam, Doug; McCarthy, John D.; Zald, Mayer N. (Eds.). 1996. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures and cultural framings. Londres: Cambridge University Press.
Millet, Kate. 1995. Política sexual. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Rivera, Ángela. 2016. “Joan Scott: una historiadora feminista”. https://cerosetenta.uniandes.edu.co/joan-scott-una-historiadora-feminista/
Rubin, Gayle. 1986. “El tráfico de mujeres: notas sobre la economía política del sexo”. Nueva Antropología 30: 95–145.
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1989. “Una respuesta a las críticas”. Historia Social 4: 127–135.
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1992. “Igualdad versus diferencia: los usos de la teoría postestructuralista”. Debate 4: 87–107.
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2001. “Experiencia”. Revista de Estudios de Género, La Ventana 13: 44–74.
Veleda, Juan Ignacio. 2019. “Joan Scott: aportes para una perspectiva feminista sobre la historia”. Tesis de especialización. Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Woolf, Virginia. 2013. Un cuarto propio. Buenos Aires: El cuenco de plata.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.