Is the State-Centric Conception of Human Rights Suitable for a Globalized World? A Response to Cristina Lafont
Palabras clave:
cosmopolitanism, human rights, states, authority, responsibilityResumen
In her article “Human Rights and the Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions” published in this volume of RLPF, Cristina Lafont argues that in order to impose human rights obligations to global governance institutions, the state-centric conception of human rights that pervades current international politics must be replaced by an alternative, pluralist account. In this response I claim that, when properly interpreted, the state-centric conception is not only perfectly compatible with imposing on global governance institutions the kind of obligations Lafont has in mind, but may also lead us to a better understanding of the nature of these responsibilities in a globalized world.
Descargas
Citas
Beitz, Charles (2010). The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beitz, Charles (1999). Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, J. (2007). “Is There a Human Right to Democracy?”. En Cohen, J.; Sypnowich, C. (eds.), The Egalitarian Conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clapham, A. (2006). Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donnelly, J. (2013). International Human Rights. Boulder: Westview Press.
Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guariglia, O. (2010). En camino de una justicia global. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Higgins, R. (2006). Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lafont, C. (2013). “Human Rights and the Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions”. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política.
Lafont, C. (2012). Global Governance and Human Rights. Amsterdam: Royal Van Gorcum.
Lafont, C. (2010a). “Accountability and Global Governance…”. Ethics & Global Politics, 3(3): 193–215.
Lafont, C. (2010b). “Responsabilidad, inclusión y gobernanza global…”. Isegoría, 43: 407–434.
Meckled-García, S. (2008). “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice…”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(3): 245–271.
Meckled-García, S. (2007). “How to Think about the Problem of Non-State Actors and Human Rights”. Manuscrito.
Montero, J. (2010a). “Are Affluent Countries Violating the Human Rights of the Global Poor?”. Global Ethics, 3: 22–41.
Montero, J. (2010b). “¿Es la pobreza global un problema de derechos humanos?”. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía, 33(2): 221–246.
Morsink, J. (1999). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nagel, T. (2005). “The Problem of Global Justice”. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2): 113–147.
Nickel, J. (2007). Making Sense of Human Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pogge, T. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Salomon, M. (2007). Global Responsibilities for Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sangiovanni, A. “Global Justice, Reciprocity and the State”. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1): 3–39.
Shue, H. (1996). Basic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (2002). One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.
Valentini, L. (2012). “In What Sense Are Human Rights Political?”. Political Studies, 60(1): 180–194.
