Ideal socialism and capitalism.

An analysis of the positions of Cohen and Brennan.

Authors

  • Santiago Quer Cueto Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36446/rlfp164

Keywords:

Socialism, Capitalism, Private property, Utopia, Justice, Economic growth

Abstract

Philosophers Gerard Cohen and Jason Brennan, through their books Why Not Socialism? (2009) and Capitalism, why not? (2014) respectively, discuss the moral superiority of the system that each of them defends. Both authors aim to present an exposition of the system they support in its idealized form, which they confront with the ideal version each one has of the opposite model. Idealization implies, in addition to the fact that all people are morally perfect, subtracting from characteristics that the real expressions of said models present. However, as I will show in this work, none of them achieve their purpose because they fall into comparisons of the idealized model that they defend with a version of the one they attack that includes characteristics that correspond to its real manifestations, also ignoring the difficulties that arise from moving from the small societies in which they exemplify their models to the entire society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brennan, Jason, 2014. Capitalismo, ¿por qué no? Traducido por Fernando Claro. Santiago: Fundación para el Progreso.

Cohen, Gerald A., 2011. ¿Por qué no el socialismo? Traducido por Verónica Sardón. Madrid: Katz Editores.

Published

2024-03-28

How to Cite

Quer Cueto, S. (2024). Ideal socialism and capitalism.: An analysis of the positions of Cohen and Brennan. Revista Latinoamericana De Filosofía Política, 13(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.36446/rlfp164