On the rights and duties of occupation courts
Comments on Alejandro Chehtman’s account
Palabras clave:
Alejandro Chehtman, criminal jurisdiction, just and unjust occupants, occupation courts, rights and dutiesResumen
Alejandro Chehtman has developed a sophisticated moral argument to support a limited version of the principle of symmetry between just and unjust belligerents. He argues that both types of belligerent have symmetric rights and duties to judge and punish criminal offenders in occupied territories. In this paper I argue that although his argument shows that there is symmetry regarding rights, it does not show the same regarding duties. Just occupants do not have a duty to provide criminal justice in the occupied territories, or at least not a duty as stringent as that of unjust occupants. The reason is that a self-defensive just occupant, unlike an unjust occupant, cannot be regarded as ultimately responsible for the occupation, nor for remedying its undesired consequences -such as the interruption of the system of criminal justice-, at least when remedying them would impose considerable costs on the occupant.
Descargas
Citas
Chehtman, A. (2013). “Occupation Courts, Jus ad Bellum, and Non-State Actors: Revisiting the Ethics of Military Occupation”. Jean Monnet Working Paper 15/13. New York: New York University School of Law.
Dinstein, Y. (2009). The International Law of Belligerent Occupation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fabre, C. (2012). Cosmopolitan War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hohfeld, W. (1919). Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McMahan, J. (2009a). Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McMahan, J. (2009b). “The Morality of Military Occupation”. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 31: 101–123.
Raz, J. (1988). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nations War Crimes Commission (1949). Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. 8. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Valentini, L. (2009). “Justice and Assistance: Three Approaches and a Fourth One”. CSSJ Working Papers Series SJ009.
Wenar, L. (2005). “The Nature of Rights”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33(3): 223–253.
